後真相:鏡海撈針 Post-Truth: Fool Others as Well as Oneself

蔡国杰 Cai Guojie

策展人,中国美术学院博士 Curator,PhD from China Academy of Art

Uncategorized

文/蔡国杰 2021.04

後真相:鏡海撈針-身體重拾主體的共覺基礎

      「行為藝術家自身就是一件一輩子的作品,需要不斷去推翻、重塑、雕琢,每次作品的呈現看到的都是藝術家這個人的改變,這個對於我而言是很重要的。」——王彥鑫

         臨場的”我”,若以”身體、主體、知覺”區分來分析事件中的現象,三者的覺知順序是什麽?變量的覺知相互關係中我們要如何理解現場體驗中的真實?而體查的真實如何紀錄?紀錄又該如何呈現真相呢?在和彥鑫的對話中,他提到了:2016年“後真相”一詞出現在牛津詞典,指出所謂的“後真相”,並不是說“真相”本身發生了什麽變化,而是輿論對於“真相”的態度發生了轉變。正如《經濟學人》在其發佈的“Art of the lie”一文中對後真相進行解讀—“真相沒有被篡改,也沒有被質疑,只是變得次要了。”我們所有的現實,都是由我們所擁有的的知識所構建的,知識又是由權力所掌控的。由此推理可得,我們的現實是由權力所構建的,這使得現實本身就是“可塑”的,同時又是值得被抵抗的。

         在我看來,王彥鑫在現場的行為中是以「震驚」的方式來和觀眾生發和架構的關系,在本次《後真相–鏡海撈針》個展之前,王彥鑫受邀參加了澳門國際現場藝術節,在舊法院現場的特定性中,他的作品《Macau》以一種侵入性和威脅感的方式和觀眾相對起來,觀眾的反應中,其參與的主體紛紛是進行選擇的,而主體的選擇權恰是趨向平權的明証。還有一點特別之處,事件現場中,觀眾的主觀和身體在覺知中被驚嚇而分開,面對現場行為的驚嚇,觀眾不像格林伯格描述用震驚產生距離和崇高,觀眾沒有自我渺小,反是持選擇權的雙權向關係,從這一點來看彥鑫的實踐現場中其遊戲性的方式,讓震驚行為本身不違合在事件中,轉化成更大覺知閾值的範式,觀眾的身體處於覺知的牽動中和主觀的選擇關系中。

        愚拙策略與主體公約數的探明。《後真相–鏡海撈針》中的諸多紀錄,呈現著彥鑫在澳門駐留期間發起的幾次事件:《尋找死亡八小時》錄像紀錄的內容是行為者頭戴隨拍紀錄機隨意的在澳門走動八小時,當途中遇到終結的生命體,便停步用筆在旁書寫紀錄當下的時間。我們怎麽看待這一個又一個的數據?是主體在尋找彼此身體的相遇嗎?而我們在錄像紀錄的內容中,是在覺知中反身出自已的身體?扣問自身的主體狀態?《不可磨滅》發生在荔枝碗船場,行為者將拾得的舊船釘打磨除銹並收集鐵銹粉沫書寫成文字”不可磨滅Indelével”。灰燼、文字、觀念在身體行為中轉化對應著主體在空間、歷史、臨在現狀的交會,“光輝”在時態中折射出的書寫紀錄,誰是史官?何謂史實?《不可逾越》紀錄著行為者在路環獄牆下的事件,對應於澳門”租借”狀態更變後的屬性,成為跳躍嚐試的數值參照,事件中行為者在高牆下奮力的跳牆追高畫下記號,並把每一次的高度進行丈量,而量測的數據也隨之用粉筆紀錄在牆上,在總體數據中,我們可以看到體力的遞減與高度數據成正比。《餘溫》發生在葡萄牙駐澳門總領事館,行為者大百次於兩法權邊境的逐步環對,於領事館四至的界牆上用磨擦生熱的手傳遞溫度、紀錄著一種測溫槍指向的身體數據,其拓撲出的數值在平均數中詮釋餘溫。《當初》事件生發在澳門白鴿巢的基督教墳場,行為者將一奶製冰塊的骰子在墳場中任意踢行,直到冰骰子消失為止。當初的因由是懷舊,人們在什麼狀態會念及過往呢?在現場遺留的粘稠軌跡又是什麼樣的線索?《鏡海撈針》是在路環黑沙海灘的事件,行為者將一根針在岸邊投向黑沙灣的海中,隨後便下海撈針,直至夜暮。徒勞、多此一舉,身體在主體趨動下不斷的勞動,知覺在冰泠海水摸針的過程中放大,主體在這個身體、覺知拉鋸中恍惚,也在此強大。這些都呈現了彥鑫對於澳門多維度的思考。

        震驚的方式作為現場藝術的一種新的語法模式,恰如其分的映照了社會的時代性,王彥鑫的行為有其敏銳之處,遊戲發起的趨平廣結了受眾,社眾覺知身體在痛並快樂著的臨場中玩耍,事件的戲謔像是對號的玩笑,當行為者來到特定觀眾面前時,從驚嚇體查中對撞出單子的自覺,與其說社眾主體給出了選擇,更像是其選擇牽動出主體甚至自覺。愚蠢計劃的自嘲的,在求拙的徒勞中,若強說目的,那可能是行為者有意發起的探明模式,用主體遮罩(遮罩)的方法,待更深刻的理解主體外的覺知和身體,把控甚至把玩其公約數,探找進而體查登入意識的可能性,虛弱、無力,假強可以是主體缺失、是反思、是身體、主體、知覺的再視,抑或是藝術家將身份、職能放進社會生態進程中不斷的提問,也許藝術家在反身中希冀的正是主體的自覺。苦行僧般作為趨動術的鍛打,千百錘煉將化為主體啟動的能力者和行者。

Post-Truth: Fool Others as Well as Oneself - Synesthesia of Body as Subject Again

“Performance art is the lifelong work of an artist, which is constantly overthrown, reshaped and polished. The presentation of the work each time could showcase the personal changes of the artist, which is of paramount importance for me.” — Wang Yan Xin

When “I” on the scene use “Body, Subject, and Consciousness” to analyze the event, what is the order of awareness among these three? Among the variables of the awareness of this relationship, how could we perceive the reality from our live experience? How could we personally record the reality? How could the truth be presented through the records? In a dialogue with Yan Xin, he mentioned that the term of “post-truth” was first included in the Oxford Dictionary in 2016, highlighting the so-called ‘post-truth” does not mean any changes of “truth” but the changes in the public attitude towards the “truth”. In an article titled “Art of the lie”, the Economist interprets the post-truth and says, “The truth is not falsified, or contested, but of secondary importance.” Our reality is constructed by our knowledge, which is controlled by the status quo. Thus, it can be concluded that our reality is constructed by the status quo, which makes the reality malleable and subject to resistance at the same time. 

In my opinions, Wang Yan Xin adopts a “shocking” approach to establish the relationship with the audience during the live performance. Prior to “Post-Truth: Fool Others as Well as Oneself”,  Wang has been invited to participate in the Macao  International Art Performance Festival held at the Old Court Building. His work Macau connected with the audience in an intrusive and threatening way, in which the subject of the audience made the choices, and the right to choose is a testament to equal rights. Another highlight at the live performance is that the subject of the audience was separated from the awareness of the body when shocked. In light of the shocking live performance, the audience did not belittle themselves as Greenberg says the sense of alienation and authority could be created through shock, but the audience actually had the right to choose in this relationship of dual powers. This shows Yan Xin practices a game-based approach in performance art so that the shocking behaviours could conform to the event and transform into a paradigm of greater thresholds for awareness while the body of the audience is found in the relationship between the awareness and subjective choices.

The exploration and understanding of foolish strategies and the common factors of the subject. The various works in “Post-Truth:Fool Others as Well as Oneself” illustrate several incidents during the stay of Yan Xin in Macao: In 8 Hours of Searching for Death, the artist wears a GoPro head strap to record his eight-hour wandering in Macao. When he comes across any dead organisms, he will stop and use a pen to mark the time on the spot. How should we interpret these figures? Is it an encounter of the subjects when looking for the bodies? Is our awareness reflected on the body in the video? Are we questioning the status of the subject? Indelible takes place at the shipyard of Lai Chi Vun, in which the artist polishes and removes the rust on the old ship nails he has found, before using the rust powder collected to write the words “Indelible (Indelével)”. The transformation of ashes, words and ideas amid the behaviours of the body echoes the convergence of the subject in space, history and current status. In the “glory” reflected in the tenses of the written records, who writes the history and what is history? Unpassable records the behaviours of the artist next to the walls of the Coloane prison. The changing status of “leasing” of Macao becomes a reference for jump attempts. The artist exhausts all his energy to jump beside the high walls and marks how high he could jump each time on the wall with chalk. These figures show that the declining stamina is directly proportional to the height of jump. Warmth concerns the Consulate General of Portugal in Macao, in which the artist walks around the boundaries between two jurisdictions, rubs his hands over a hundred times and touches the walls of the Consulate General before checking the temperature with an infrared thermometer. The average of these figures elucidates what is warmth. At the Beginning takes place at the Grand Lisboa Macau. The artist Kicking a dice made by milk ice cube at Grand Lisboa Macau, until it disappears.WhatAt the Beginning concerns is nostalgia. What is the status of people when they are recalling the past. What are the clues left on the sticky track in the cemetery? Fool Others as Well as Oneself depicts the artist throwing a needle into the sea at Hac Sa Beach in Coloane, who then looks for it until nighttime. This experience is futile and unnecessary — under the lead of the subject, there is the constant labour of the body and the exaggeration of consciousness when looking for a needle in the cold water. In this battle between the body and awareness, the subject is tranced but strengthened. These all showcase the multidimensional thinking of Yan Xin towards Macao.

The shocking approach as a new language of performance art aptly reflects the contemporary side of the society. With the astuteness of Wang Yan Xin’s behaviours, the game initiated by him has flattered and gathered the audience, who are joyfully playing but are aware of the pains of the body.  The sarcasm of the event is like a banter — when the artist walks to the front of a particular audience member the self-consciousness is evoked through the shocks. Instead of an active choice by the subject of the audience, it is more likely the other way round and even with self awareness. If we have to talk about the goals of the foolish plan that makes fun of oneself and the futile labour, it is, perhaps, a method of exploration and understanding by the artist. With the subject masked, the awareness and body could be better understood without the subject, controlling and even playing with the common factor, as well as exploring and reviewing the possibilities of seizing the consciousness. Weakness, vulnerability and pretense could be the faults of the subject, the reflections, and the reassessment of body, subject and consciousness. Or are these the constant questions asked by the artist concerning identity and functions in the social ecosystem? Perhaps what the artist hopes is the consciousness of the subject, as the forging of techniques like an ascetic monk and the seasoned enabler that could initiate the subject.

Wang Yanxin, born in 1988 in Lanzhou, Gansu, China. graduated from Sichuan Fine Arts Institute in 2013. Since 2012, he has been engaged in multi-media artistic creation based on performance art. He currently lives and works in Chengdu and is a professor at Sichuan Conservatory of Culture and Arts.

订阅Newsletter

Copyright by wangyanxin.com. 版权所有.